Is a zero-torque push rod suitable for you? This is what you should know

The putter market has been in an interesting battle with “zero torque” over the past few years. As Lab Golf flourishes in the tour and retail industry, Odyssey pours into Hot with the Square 2 Square, and nearly every other putter makers will create their own perspectives, and zero torque is chewing real estate on the market.

But are these putters suitable for everyone? The simple answer is, no, they are not. But let’s dive in.

What’s this…

The concept of low-key (resistance to distortion) is essentially all Device for forgiveness. The more squares you can hit your face, the greater the chance any player will have. However, you have to consider that every player is a human, all of whom have different strokes, feelings and reactions to the center of gravity. That’s why there are no clubs on the market that perform well all Player. It does not exist.

When Lab debuted on the tour for the first time, I not only had to pay attention to how many players were testing and converting, but also the type of players who were interested in the concept. It was widespread at first, but it became more specific as players and coaches began to experiment with the technology.

I’ve seen a few reality:

1. The zero pressure putter is a good reset for a player who is really struggling. I haven’t seen this type of putts get better, but I’ve seen these putts recover their players on the putt death bed (for example, Lucas Glover and Adam Scott).

2. Zero or low-key putters require some concessions when playing. First, you have to be willing to let the putter do 75-80% of the work. When the putter wants to correct (kick back), more or less attempts to relieve any face rotation that the player may have injected into the stroke. If you are a player who releases your toes and puts your toes like that, a zero-torque putter will fight you and cause all sorts of problems. That’s unless You can change the settings to accommodate and grab more dead hands, arms, all the way to pull the head.

The point is that if you enter the market on this putter model, you’re perfect for this 100%. period. These are still niche clubs, although all the marketing buzz we see now may not feel that way.

Now, about marketing…

If you’ve been following you might find out who goes into the zero tar game and why they are having a war. Some observers say some putters look similar to others, but I don’t think it’s important because the borrowing idea is Very Popular on devices. Used in the form of Ping Anser and Cleveland 588 – Sampling from these ideas establishes careers.

Additionally, the device buzz starts from the PGA Tour. That’s no secret. Want people to validate your product? Play with the best players in the world. This trip is still a cool kids club, and players on weekends want to hang out with cool kids.

Over the past year or so, we’ve seen labs occupy more or less the low-key usage in major travel, but as the market is now full of different OEM options, you’re seeing numbers start to change slowly. For example, this week on the Korn Ferry Tour, Odyssey Golf had 13 low-key putts (11 non-competitor vs. eight) and it was the first time that I knew the lab did not lead the low-key putt count.

What does this mean? Only this market becomes evilly competitive and consumer choice continues to grow. That’s awesome!

Both companies offer different benefits. The laboratory makes a beautiful putter, too Very Stable. There are many shapes and options to choose from, and, this is the Odyssey. Their face and targeting skills are second to none. (Yes, I used to work there, but I still believe it.)

There are other interesting options for Zero Cyclone. The Taylormade Spider version will do a great job. Ping has one; pxg; Betty Nader; Scotty Cameron; and more to come.

I think the low-key model will account for 10-15% of the future market. It all adds to the success on paper, but it’s not a big picture. It’s still a very small segment, it’s OK.

This is how the device buzzes: buzz. It is necessary to build motivation, but pay attention to the best your game.

The rhythm is this simple fact:

Travel uses, creates buzz, the public wants to learn more, OEM reactions, big box demand and big box end up for sale. For standard equipment, this works well; but in this case, a step (education!), which is why I wrote this article. Consumers need to know more – i.e., these putts are most effective for a particular player. Can they be a 20 obstacle, and their faces are more efficient? certainly. I will admit, just like Super Game Improves Iron.

I love what the labs do here – a young, hungry and talented company breaking into a very competitive space. Now, this space is attracting some very harsh players in the game, and the field will be won by education rather than innovation. Whether you (the consumer) knows more about these putters will be the main factor in the thriving of these companies.

As we said, this happens at the baseline level, but there are more lawns to mow. It would be fun to see who stepped up his efforts.