If the Boston Bruins want to add a top six to their roster this offseason, they should emphasize signing players like Brock Boeser. The 28-year-old right-wing player will become an unrestricted free agent on July 1 this year and has been one of the most stable scorers in the NHL throughout his career. Since the Brown Bears aims to rebuild quickly rather than completely rebuild the lineup, Boeser can provide what the team needs behind David Pastrnak.
In the season’s 40-goal, 73-point game, Boothsey scored 25 goals and 50 points in 75 games against the Vancouver Canucks last season. While returning to Boeser’s 2023–24 form would be ideal, the reality is that his career production is more consistent with his release in 2024-25. Any team signed by Booth should expect only 20 goals and about 50 points per season, which is enough to make Bruins a second-tier right wing for the foreseeable future. In more context, 16 of Boeser’s 25 goals had uniform strength, while scored nine in a power match. He added 14 even assists and added 11 more assists to Man Advantage, with a total of 30 points and 20 power points last season.
The Value of Brock Boeser
For example, Boeser should be on the Bruis radar on players like Mitch Marner, depending on the contract each player is expected to sign during the offseason. Although Marner is one of the NHL’s elite talents, able to score and shine as a organizer, this type of work often pays off in free agents. Even if critics point to the playoff performance against Marner, the fact remains that he scored 221 goals and 741 points in 657 regular season games and scored 13 goals and 63 points in 70 playoff games. In the playoffs, Manner scored 2 goals and 13 points in 13 games, far from the Toronto Maple Leafs’ problem.
In fact, Marner will command more than $13 million per season in the open market, which may be too rich for the Bruins. That’s not to say they shouldn’t go to his camp, as he will undoubtedly improve any team he joins in the offseason. But if Boeser signs a contract that is close to $8 million to $8.5 million a year, then the brown bear would be a wise consideration. Boeser won’t produce at Marner’s level – Few will do – but if the Brown Bears can land Boeser, another $45 to $5 million for players, that could be a big help in accelerating this repetition.
While the Canucks will almost certainly like to fuse Boeser together, as the offseason approaches quickly, it doesn’t seem like the card on both sides.
“To be honest, that’s unlikely,” Boothell said returning to the Canucks next season. “It’s sucking, it’s unfortunate. I just want to play good hockey and then I’ll worry about everything after that. We all know it’s a roller coaster for the year. There are a lot of different things.”
The most unfortunate thing about the whole discussion was that Garners signed Jake Debrusk’s Jake Debrusk last season to sign a seven-year contract that would hit $5.5 million in annual revenue per year. For reference, DeBrusk played in all 82 games of the Canucks, scoring 28 goals and 48 points in his first season in Vancouver. Let DeBrusk Walk make such a team-friendly deal and then it’s possible to replace him with comparable players in order to get more money after an offseason, ultimately a loss strategy at the end of the day. Still, the team can’t avoid it just because it looks bad in hindsight. This may be unfortunate, but it should not prevent the team from taking action to help with optics.
Related: 2 Bears who need next season
Boeser is a good NHL player and a reliable scorer, something Bruis desperately lacks outside Pastrnak. If the team can find a way to keep Pastenak, Elias Lindholm and Morgan Geekie rolling on the team’s top line, then push Pavel Zacha and Pavel Zacha and Boeser out of the second line, they’ll be in a good form early in the offseason. Zacha also has the possibility of returning to the highest line to join Pastrnak, and Lindholm joined his former teammates to the team’s second line.
At this point, the brown bear’s hat space has choice and flexibility. While there may not be a clear “correct answer”, there are certainly options that can prevent them. Boeser seems to be well suited to Boston’s needs, but it remains to be seen whether the parties have a common interest and can reach a consensus on the conditions.
Source link
